Fitbit Charge 3 Review – 2019

Formed from a finished bit of aluminum brushed in something taking after graphite (at any rate on the model I checked on), the Charge 3 truly is the most attractive and most agreeable of the “greater” Fitbits — something like the Flex 2 just vanishes on your wrist — with an arch that impeccably shapes the wrist. You’ll discover a precious stone designed elastic games band in the crate, however I settled on the $35 Charcoal Woven Band, which adjusts pleasantly properly utilizing Fitbit’s restrictive speedy discharge system.

Fitbit Charge 3 Review

That Fitbit has assembled a clean side business on frill isn’t astonishing — they’re simply playing Apple’s diversion — yet what is astounding is exactly how well-made and agreeable these groups are. Indeed, even the $50 Horween cowhide band merits a look. All things considered, the groups are incredibly costly — the cowhide band is a third the expense of the tracker itself — and unquestionably difficult to legitimize when you’re probably endeavoring to set aside some cash by going with a wellness tracker in any case. Fortunately, Amazon is brimming with good quality nylon, cowhide, and metal groups for the Charge 3.

The significant contrast between the Charge 3 and its ancestor, at any rate from an equipment point of view, is the move from a square shaped plan to one of unpretentious bend, and from a physical catch to an inductive one that makes the tracker waterproof up to 5 ATM, or 50 meters, which implies that except if you’re a scuba jumper you can securely wear this thing day in and day out 365. All things considered, at any rate when you’re not charging it.

The addition of a touchscreen is great

There’s additionally a full greyscale touchscreen, which reacts not simply to taps just swipes. To call the UI shortsighted would be putting it mildly, yet I’m not by any means beyond any doubt what else I need — a large portion of the included watch faces are thick enough to give step and pulse information each time I lift my wrist or contact the screen, and a swipe up from the base uncovers a rundown of any metric I could think about, from calories consumed to minutes dynamic to water expended.

Squeezing the side catch dependably takes you back to the past screen; holding it displays a fast settings box to impair warnings or programmed screen waking. To one side of the homescreen are the Charge 3’s applications, or what goes for applications by the organization’s tracker norms. While Fitbit doesn’t guarantee that the Charge arrangement is a smartwatch in the customary sense, it likes to tout its insight. In any case, when you investigate the sprinkling of applications — a clock, an alert, and a climate application to oblige the standard exercise and contemplation schedules — you’ll rapidly understand this isn’t attempting to be anything besides a wellness tracker.

So, half a month after the Charge 3 was discharged, it got an update to give it brisk answers on approaching notices when matched to an Android application. The component was ported straightforwardly from the organization’s Versa and Ionic smartwatches, and it works similarly also — or inadequately, contingent upon your necessities — here.

They’re altogether arranged in the incredible Fitbit application, however as a matter of course you can react, “Yes” or “No” or “What’s happening?” or “Can’t talk presently, will react later,” alongside a couple of other quotidian expressions. Those, alongside different emoticons, give the essential fuel to a better than average bi-directional communication model, yet just in the most oversimplified of terms. Much else complex than an approval emoticon and you’ll be removing your telephone from your pocket.

All things considered, I’ve utilized pretty much every smartwatch available, including Fitbit’s own choices, and I wind up expecting to triage warnings and offer short answers more than I ever need to hail a Uber or utilize my screen as a remote camera shade. Accordingly, I wind up getting a charge out of the Charge 3’s arranged straightforwardness since it’s just extraneously a cell phone buddy. Its basic role is to follow your wellbeing, and like all Fitbits it does this, great.

I state this recognizing the organization hasn’t generally had a strong notoriety for exactness, however those issues have been to a great extent settled with enhancements to the sensors inside its trackers alongside updates to its calculations to all the more likely identify what really establishes a stage, or a dash, or a dip lap. I wore the Fitbit Charge 3 alongside a Motiv Ring for about fourteen days in a row, and the progression checks were inside a few hundred every day, with the Fitbit for the most part on the higher end. While I wouldn’t prescribe the Charge 3 to any genuine competitor — its absence of GPS alone presumably excludes it from that classification — however to the normal individual climbing, running, biking, yoga-ing, or swimming a couple of times each week, it’ll be impeccable.

Quite a bit of that ability is owed to exactly how recline the Fitbit experience has progressed toward becoming. Not exclusively does the Charge 3 most recent seven days for each charge — that likens to around four and somewhat top-ups every month — however once it’s additional to your Fitbit account, the entire thing just works. It transfers information to the application out of sight, consequently identifies steps, rest, and exercises, and offers significant bits of knowledge about how you’re living.

I’ve generally been a genuinely dynamic individual and felt Fitbit’s measurements — every one of trackers’ measurements, truth be told — were intriguing yet not especially important. That changed when I understood the connection among’s activity and rest, or deficiency in that department, while turning into a parent. I don’t rest so much nowadays, so to counterbalance the unavoidable vitality misfortune I must be considerably more careful about what I eat and the amount I move. I see that even the days I rest generally well — six hours contrasted with three or four — I can in any case keep my eyes open well into the night on the off chance that I invest some energy in the bicycle, or go for a decent, long climb with my pooch.

In the meantime, Fitbit’s rest information, and the manner in which it’s exhibited, is unparalleled in the business. Each wellness wearable tracks steps and work out, and most presently do as such naturally, yet few seriously plot rest data into classes — what Fitbit calls Sleep Stages — like the Charge 3 and its companions.

What’s more, because of the omnipresence of Fitbits in the customary populace, it has the most vigorous social highlights of any wellness environment, matched just by independent applications like Strava and MapMyRun and Apple’s developing system of Apple Watch clients. For sure, with more seasoned Apple Watch models accessible under $200, Fitbit likely needs to interest Android clients like never before. (The less we talk about upgrades to Google Fit, the better.)

That conveys me to a portion of the Charge 3’s issues. While I haven’t encountered any significant programming bugs with the Charge 3, Fitbit’s people group discussions are covered with posts about how the Charge 3 isn’t just surrey however broken. The update discharged toward the beginning of November that implied to fix various bugs while presenting new highlights like Quick Replies and Fitbit Pay has apparently presented an entire group of new concerns. While these individuals positively don’t speak to an expansive level of Charge 3 proprietors in reality, the organization’s appearing powerlessness to suppress bugs or guarantee the consistency of its experience is vexing.

Fitbit Charge 3 Review Bluetooth

Some portion of the issue is likely Bluetooth itself: Fitbit needs to make a gadget that chips away at iOS, Android, and Windows, and indistinguishably over every one of the three stages. Bluetooth is a famously finicky convention and I have almost certainly that a considerable lot of the general population having issues with the Charge 3 are utilizing more established Android gadgets with maturing programming.

Bluetooth issues are as yet present, however they’re less unavoidable now than they used to be.

However, that is no reason; Fitbit is the name on the case, and Samsung or LG can’t and won’t be considered in charge of an awful encounter on the wrist. I even had a minor issue getting my Charge 3 to combine to my Pixel 3 out of the blue, and needed to add it to another telephone first to get my Pixel 3 to remember it. Once included, it’s been superbly strong, yet I can just envision somebody getting hindered from matching the tracker to their telephone totally, without access to another gadget. Not an incredible early introduction.

At that point there’s simply the notices. While in fact the Charge 3’s warnings are a reward include added to a standard-toll wellness tracker, they’re liable to indistinguishable impulses from notices on the more costly Versa and Ionic. Fitbit utilizes Android’s standard notice snares to, with authorization, dismantle the significant substance to the wearable. You need to tell the Charge 3, through the Android application, which notices to pull from. The issue is that they possibly gone to the wrist when they hit the telephone, and gratitude to Android’s extraordinary battery-sparing systems, they frequently come in waves, bringing about a 10-second bedlam of haptic seismic tremors at whatever point my telephone awakens chooses to download 15 messages. It’s not actually Fitbit’s issue, in essence, yet it’s an issue that, on account of Wear OS’s more tightly incorporation with Android itself, helpfully maintains a strategic distance from.

The Charge 3 likewise just offers its incipient Fitbit Pay highlight with a Special Edition (read: NFC-able) adaptation that costs $20 more. While I welcome the way that this unimportant component is excluded for value delicate clients, however I have a feeling that it ought to be standard, if just to stay away from client perplexity.

There are some other minor issues with the Charge 3 that I’m willing to pardon as a result of its constrained aspiration: the tracker accompanies a climate module (I won’t consider it an application) alongside an alert, the two of which should be set up through the application before they do anything. When they’re included, they’re there everlastingly, yet any support should be done on the telephone itself.

Read More:

Notifications on the Charge 3 are fine, but with Quick Replies on Android they’re actually pretty useful.

All this leads me to ask the high-level question — why get a Charge 3 when the industry, including Fitbit itself, seems to be moving towards smartwatches? The answer, at least to me, is about scope. The Charge 3 does exactly what it sets out to do — accrue copious amounts of health data, and send me notifications from my phone — and pretty darn well at that. The Versa, on the other hand, is flawed because of its ambition: its app ecosystem is barren, and it introduces far more compromise than it addresses with a more complex interaction method. Plus, its battery lasts half as long.

Fitbit Charge 3 Review – Conclude

I think Fitbit will likely address a lot of the flaws in its smartwatch ecosystem in 2019 with its second-gen Versa and Ionic products, but until then I’d much rather have a Charge 3 and a phone than the Versa on its own.

See it in AMAZON >> Fitbit Charge 3 Fitness Activity Tracker


Leave a Reply