What do users say about Fitbit Charge 3 Fitness Activity Tracker ? 2019


Do you know “Fitbit Charge 3 Fitness Activity Tracker

Fitbit Charge 3 Fitness Activity Tracker

In Amazon it have price: $149 >> View it in Amazon

About Product: 

  • Better measure calorie burn, understand resting heart rate & more with 24/7 heart rate tracking and a battery life of up to 7 days (varies with use and other factors)
  • Choose from 15+ exercise modes like run, bike, swim, yoga, circuit training and more, set a goal, and get real-time stats during your workouts to see how you can keep getting better
  • Automatically record time spent in Light, Deep and REM sleep stages and see activity trends, health insights and personalized guidance in one place with Fitbit Today
  • Swim proof and water resistant to 50M so you can track swims and wear in the shower. Also connect to smartphone GPS for real-time pace and distance during outdoor runs and rides
    Stay connected to your day with everyday apps for weather and more and get call, text and smartphone app notifications on your wrist

What do users say about Fitbit Charge 3 Fitness Activity Tracker ?

Mark Evans said

Consider the utility of a smartwatch when your phone never leaves your side. There’s simply nothing the smartwatch is going to do that the phone couldn’t do better, so a fitness tracker that’s light, attractive, and forgettable on your wrist is arguably the most logical choice. Fitbit ‘usually’ get’s it done and looks good doing it.

Peter Said:

Had a Charge 3 with the latest firmware. Something wasn’t feeling quite right during my jogging. I decided to test the results with my Polar F2, a strapped monitor. The Charge 3 was 20 to 30 beats UNDER, as in Polar HR 150, Charge 3 HR 130. Returned for a refund and so long Fitbit, it was good to know ya.

ItsAndyDamnit said:

I had a charge 1 and have the charge 2 now. I really liked them both and think the 3 is a nice improvement and will likely get one. I think you missed the point on what this is, though your comments are all around it: …this really is the casual fitness tracker, perfected.

If you’re a super-athlete, you probably want something big and gps connected. If you want a smart watch, you probably want a big smart watch. If you’re anyone in between, this is perfect. I do yoga once a week and bike and workout a few other times. I like easily getting those “numbers” to see how I did and compare to previous week’s.

It’s small, it works, with a cheap leather band off amazon it can look nice (People ask what kind of watch I have all the time). To me it gives me everything i want and nothing else. I think there are many others that don’t want all the smart watch features and/or bulk and price.

sunnytater said:

Having had a Surge and now a Charge 2, I much prefer this over a smartwatch. Less charging time, more tracking of not only health, but sleep is a huge deal. If this new one does those things even better, with added water resistance and sleeker design, then I’m in.

Yes, smartwatches are becoming much more prevalent, but I feel as if this article discounts people that use fitness trackers for actual fitness (without the need for GPS), and don’t have ‘emojis showing up on their watch’ on their list of needs. I don’t need to take calls on my wrist, or play games, or any other number of things Apple and Android watches are cramming into their devices, which I think is really meant for much younger generations, that some of us simply don’t need or want. I don’t buy a watch to be entertained by it – I buy a watch that is functional.

If this does what it’s designed to do perfectly, then that’s great! Especially for what seems like a solid price and will last you a long time (based on my Charge 2). Compare that to any smartwatch on the market right now – can you name one that’s perfected what it’s been designed to do? Or have a charge that lasts more than a day or two?

This seems to do exactly what I want it to do. And, as you noted, I’m happy to be falling asleep with it too. Knocking FitBit for hitting what seems to be their intended target seems strange.

If you’re still happy with your old Charge but think it’s time for a new Charge, this is a pretty good upgrade no matter if you’ve got a Charge HR, a Charge 2, or something similar. If you’ve never really gotten into fitness trackers, but want to dip your toes in the scene, then sure—try this one out. But the tide has already turned towards smartwatches, and there’s nothing I can imagine that Fitbit could dream up to stop this shift in the long run. The marquee selling point for fitness trackers has increasingly come down to price, and for now that remains a good reason to avoid fancier trackers and smartwatches. If price is a major factor for you, you might just want an $80 Fitbit Alta, or the $130 Alta HR for your daily tracking needs.

Still, at $150, the Fitbit Charge 3’s price feels more than fair. I stand by my point that this really is the casual fitness tracker, perfected. But while that may have been an exciting phrase a few years ago, in 2018 it’s starting to feel like a thing of the past.


Thank You For Reading,

If you have a question about Fitbit Charge 3, please comment below. I will try a response soon.


Comments 2

  1. SibylBig March 4, 2019
    • Dr. Linda March 21, 2019

Leave a Reply